Learning Objectives

By the end of this topic, the student should be able to:

  • Understand how to foster interprofessional teamwork for public education, treatment, prevention, and health promotion for opioid use.
  • Effectively communicate with interprofessional team members.
  • Discuss how health professionals can become involved in education in their community, province, or territory, or across Canada.

Key Concepts

  • Traditional separation of substance use disorder treatment and mental health services creates obstacles to successful care coordination; integration can address disparities, reduce cost, and improve general health outcomes.
  • A diverse group of people play roles in delivering health care to those with substance use disorder, such as nurses, doctors (including addiction specialists), counsellors, nurse practitioners, psychologists, care managers, social workers, health educators, peer workers, pharmacists, and others.
  • In an Indigenous context, the team might also include Elders, knowledge keepers, thought leaders, healers, community health workers, and traditional medicine folks—to name a few.

How to Foster Interprofessional Teamwork

Traditional separation of substance use disorder treatment and mental health services creates obstacles to successful care coordination. This separation results in unintended impediments, reinforcing the notion that substance use disorders differ from other medical conditions.

Emergency departments, hospitals, and general medical care often fail to recognize or address health problems related to substance use.

Service integration can address disparities, reduce cost, and improve general health outcomes.

  • Many individuals who use substances access health care for acute reasons, such as injury, illness, or overdose. They may also access health and social services because of HIV/AIDs, heart disease, depression, or other health or social issues.
  • A diverse group of people play a role in delivering health care to those with substance use disorder, such as nurses, doctors, counsellors, nurse practitioners, psychologists, care managers, social workers, health educators, peer workers, pharmacists, and others.

NOTE: Doctors continue to prescribe for 91 percent of clients who suffered a non-fatal overdose (Office of the Surgeon General, 2016).

Collaboration between physicians, nurses, and other health and social service professionals leads to improved awareness of one another’s knowledge and skills.

  • Fostering an attitude of mutual respect and trust helps health and social service professionals work together to the benefit of the service user (O’Daniel & Rosenstein, 2008).

Formal communication is fundamental as it provides the opportunity for all team members to work together, speak a common language, and come to a consensus.

  • Building a shared agenda can help guide the direction of the meeting, and minutes are useful for people to refer to at a later date.
  • Inter-team memos are also seen as efficient methods for updates.

NOTE: Emails are sometimes viewed negatively as some people do not have the time to read all the emails they receive, and some were not computer savvy (Brown et al., 2009).

Interprofessional Collaboration as Part of the Continuum of Care

To optimize health outcomes, team-based health care approaches that facilitate interprofessional collaboration are being recognized as effective interventions for opioid misuse and treatment.

Randomized control trials have shown improved client outcomes when the interprofessional team members collaborate in multi-modal care planning with the individual and their family (Matthys, Remmen & Van Bogaert, 2017). Referred to as collaborative care (CC), this model of care involves a number of health professionals working with a person who uses drugs to comprehensively address issues related with opioid use.

  • Normally, the collaborative care team consists of a medical professional, a case manager (ideally someone who can offer help with medication), and a mental health specialist.
  • It is based on the chronic care model, which integrates behavioural health into primary care (Van Eeghen, Littenberg & Kessler, 2018).
Evidence icon

Evidence suggests that by using the collaborative care approach, treatment outcomes can be significantly improved.

  • Watkins et al. (2017) carried out a randomized controlled trial of 377 clients to assess the impact of a collaborative care versus usual primary care.
    • Individuals who received collaborative care reported abstaining from opioids 6 months longer after treatment compared to the control group.

The stepwise collaborative process matches treatment intensity, pharmacotherapy, delivery setting, and support to indicators of user stability (Stoller, 2015).

Comprehensive addiction evaluation and individualized treatment plans should be supported over usual primary care. Treatment can include behavioural therapy (such as addiction treatment counselling, cognitive behavioural therapy, or motivational interviewing), medications, cultural interventions, or a combination of approaches.

  • The specific type of treatment or combination of treatments will depend on the individual’s needs.
  • A combination of approaches appears to be more effective than a single approach because each type of treatment works on a different aspect of addiction.
  • People who use drugs often suffer from other health problems, as well as occupational, legal, family, and social problems that should be addressed simultaneously.

In the United States, different professions are implementing initiatives that can help to address the opioid crisis. These initiatives are outlined below.

Regis University Rueckert-Hartman College for Health Professions (RHCHP). Represented opioid panel health care professions and associated professional association opioid initiatives.

Table 1: Professional Association Initiatives/Guidelines.
Profession Professional Association Initiatives/Guidelines
Counseling Behavioral Health emphasizes the use of supportive psychotherapy, behavioral strategies, and medication-assisted treatment to address opioid dependence and addiction. Comprehensive, whole-person therapies are designed to help the patient understand the triggers for opioid misuse, develop strategies to effectively address underlying etiologies, and incorporate healthy relationships and community in recovery.
Nursing The American Nurses Association (ANA) is focusing nursing efforts on assessing, diagnosing, and managing patients with addiction through the expansion of medication-assisted treatment, training opioid prescribers, increasing the awareness of prescription drug monitoring programs, increasing access to Naloxone, and in the development of abuse-deterrent formulations.
Occupational Therapy Occupational therapy (OT) practice in pain management focuses on biopsychosocial approaches to address occupational functioning, activity promotion, and self-management. The American Occupational Therapy Association (AOTA) promotes consumer guidelines for managing chronic pain and provides educational fact sheets on OT’s role in pain rehabilitation and substance abuse. As part of the U.S. Surgeon General’s call to action to fight opioid abuse, AOTA and state OT associations are working to develop solutions to address the opioid crisis.
Pharmacy The American Pharmacists Association® has an Opioid Center designed to closely monitor, respond, and inform their membership about opioid use, abuse, and misuse. Housed within the practice section of the website, the opioid center provides tools and guidelines, clinical and patient resources, as well as state and federal resources. The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists has a series of policy positions related to stewardship of drugs with potential for abuse, controlled substance diversion and patient access, naloxone availability, prescription drug abuse, and pain management. Also, they provide a formal statement regarding the role of pharmacist’s in substance abuse prevention, education, and assistance.
Physical Therapy

The American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) is educating consumers about the benefits of physical therapy as a safer alternative to opioids in their #ChoosePT campaign (moveforwardPT.com). The APTA’s Position Paper outlines what the profession is doing to identify their role in pain management based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC’s) recommendations to move towards nonpharmacologic alternatives.

Effective Communication with Interprofessional Team Members

Improved teamwork and communication were stated as the most important factors in improving clinical and job satisfaction (O’Daniel & Rosenstein, 2008).

  • Structured communication tools provide a framework for communication and promote more information sharing with increased clarity.
    • It is useful to use structured communication techniques such as SBAR (situation, background, assessment, and recommendation).

NOTE: Health and social service teams that do not work together and have to collaborate are more likely to make a mistake (O’Daniel & Rosenstein, 2008).

Tips for Interprofessional Team Communication

Body Language

When speaking with interprofessional teams, members should ensure their body language is inviting and relaxed and that they use a friendly tone (Lance & McCullough, n.d.). Studies suggest that up to 93 percent of communication occurs through body language (O’Daniel & Rosenstein, 2008).

Confident Participation

Health and social service providers should be confident in communications, be personable, and ask clarifying questions (Lance & McCullough, n.d.).

Clear and Concise

Health and social service providers should be concise and clear when speaking with others and avoid using jargon and acronyms (Lance & McCullough, n.d.).

Implement and Evaluate Programs with an Interprofessional Team

Health and social service professionals often fail to detect opioid use disorder (OUD) in their clients. However, various screening tools and strategies are available for health and social service professionals to cope with opioid addiction or overdose among people receiving services. See Module 3, Topic A for more information on screening tools.

Helping People Ask For and Get Help

Often, people who use opioids find it difficult to ask for help regarding a potential OUD because of reasons like:

  • trust issues with health and social service professionals,
  • fear of legal implications,
  • stigma, or
  • other societal factors such as inability to access the community resources readily (Monteiro et al., 2016).

Therefore, health and social service professionals are encouraged to offer early interventions in the form of motivational methods, when applicable. See Module 4, Topic G for more information on motivational methods.

Further, health and social service professionals must offer to counsel or refer people with possible OUD for assessment, prevention, and—when applicable—treatments for OUD.

Other Interprofessional Considerations

Proper communication and vigilant discharge prescription planning are essential for perioperative care and should include coordinating with post-discharge service “with referral to multidisciplinary pain and addiction medicine services” (Macintyre et al., 2020, p. 9).

Medication-assisted treatment (MAT) is the use of medications with counselling and behavioural therapies for OUD and help prevent opioid overdose. Therefore, primary care clinics, which develop treatment models for OUD, should all integrate MAT strategies to improve client outcomes (for example the use of Methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone, Naloxone).

Evaluating the Care Plan

Health and social service providers should ensure there is an evaluation of an interprofessional care plan, which involves:

  • behaviour change counselling,
  • referral to treatment, and other non-opioid treatment options for chronic pain, and
  • approaches the person with OUD from a holistic perspective.

Evaluation should be incorporated into all program services for people with OUD. Effective approaches to assessment and treatment of people with OUD should be identified, incorporated, and revised, as necessary.

Getting the Interprofessional Word Out

Interprofessional workshops and health education programs can be developed whereby students and professionals from medicine, nursing, pharmacy, physical therapy, and social work participate in client-focused care with OUD (Monteiro et al., 2017).

  • These workshops would demonstrate knowledge of opioid use prevention, risk factors for opioid overdose, appropriate use of naloxone, and proper training for its administration (Monteiro et al., 2017).

What Does Intersectionality Mean?

The concept of intersectionality recognizes the co-occurrence of multiple forms of oppression that intersect.

Definition

Intersectionality
Intersectionality has been defined as the product of overlapping and intersecting oppressions that arise out of the combination of various oppressions that, together, intertwine and produce a compounding effect that intensifies the impact of any single oppression. This resulting effect becomes something unique and distinct from any one form of oppression standing alone.

An intersectional approach considers the historical, social, and political context of drug use and recognizes the unique experience of the individual based on the intersection of all forms of oppression and discrimination.

If providers view substance use from an intersectional perspective, they are less likely to miss important contextual features of a person’s life that may be central to their health, well-being, and recovery, such as oppression associated with poverty, gender, ethnocultural identity, sexual orientation, ability, religion, and so on.

Intersectionality and Substance Use

Intersectionality can be applied to better understand how the intersection of identities (e.g., racialized persons, women, older adults) and structural inequalities (racism, classism, sexism, homophobia) may adversely impact access to health care and reproduce inequity within certain groups.

Icon for bias.
  1. Bias among health and social service providers has been linked to poorer quality of care and health inequities in racialized populations.
  2. Gender differences in life experiences (e.g., employment choices, family life) are an important contributor to differential health outcomes, such as higher mortality among men and higher morbidity among women.

When applied to addiction, an intersectionality framework suggests that addiction stigma may also intersect with other forms of bias, such as racism and sexism.

Individuals with substance use disorders may be treated less favourably if they belong to other marginalized categories of difference or identity.

Icon for prison.
  1. The large proportion of individuals with substance use disorders who end up in the criminal justice system instead of the health care system is often cited as an example of discrimination associated with addiction stigma.
  2. Although rates of drug use and selling are comparable between racial/ethnic groups, racialized persons (compared to Caucasians) are significantly more likely to be arrested and receive harsher sentences for drug-related offences.
  3. Compared to women, men are more likely to be sentenced and receive harsher sentences for drug-related crimes.
  4. Women involved with the criminal justice system are less likely to have committed serious or violent crime and more likely to have been a victim of such crimes; they also experience and report more mental health issues than men.

What Does Intersectoral Collaboration Mean?

Described as both a tool and a process, intersectoral collaboration is defined as

“A recognized relationship between part or parts of the health sector with part or parts of another sector which has been formed to take action on an issue to achieve health outcomes ... in a way that is more effective, efficient or sustainable than could be achieved by the health sector acting alone”
(World Health Organization, 1997, p. 3)
  • Because issues relating to opioid use span multiple sectors, including medicine, health, well-being, housing, employment, personal and family supports, and law enforcement, and different systems (local, municipal, provincial, territorial, and federal), it is imperative for individuals and agencies within each sector to know and understand the roles each play, to work together, and to avoid conflicting messages and actions.
  • Intersectoral collaboration is now recognized as an essential part of comprehensive strategies to address these issues and health disparities (Danaher, 2011).
  • Many regions and municipalities work to align and engage sector cooperation with the establishment of drug task forces or drug strategies.
  • One of the first drug strategies in Canada was established in Vancouver in 2000. This strategy, like many others, uses a four-pillar approach:
    • prevention
    • treatment
    • enforcement
    • harm reduction
  • Many regions and municipalities have developed drug strategies tailored to the needs of a particular community, designed to guide improvements in services and approaches to substance use.
    • For example, since 2015, many of these have developed opioid-specific task forces to address the opioid crisis. The following case examples make explicit the intersectoral model in practice.

Case Examples

Stop and Think

Now that you have reviewed this content, consider the following:

What is the difference between interprofessional collaboration and intersectoral collaboration?

What are some ways that you can ensure effective communication among interprofessional team members?

List some ways that misunderstandings can occur within an interprofessional team. How will you address these challenges?


References

Adams, E., & Clarmont, W. (2016). Intergenerational trauma and indigenous healing. Visions, 11(4), 7–9. https://www.heretohelp.bc.ca/visions/indigenous-people-vol11/intergenerational-trauma-and-indigenous-healing

Assembly of First Nations, National Native Addictions Partnership Foundation, & Health Canada. (2011). Honouring our strengths: A renewed framework to address substance use issues among first nations people in Canada. Minister of Health. http://nnadaprenewal.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Honouring-Our-Strengths-2011_Eng1.pdf

Aylward, C. A. (1999, November 4). Intersectionality: Crossing the theoretical and praxis divide [Paper distributed at forum]. LEAF National Forum on Equality Rights: Transforming Women’s Future—Equality Rights in the New Century, Vancouver, BC, Canada. https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/CRI/article/download/3549/3560

Bohnert, A., Nandi, A., Tracy, M., Cerda, M., Tardiff, K., Vlahov, D., & Galea, S. (2011). Policing and a risk of overdose mortality in urban neighborhoods. Drug Alcohol Dependence, 113, 62–68.

Brown, J. B., Lewis, L., Ellis, K., Stewart, M., Freeman, T. R., & Kasperski, M. J. (2009). Mechanisms for communicating within primary health care teams. Canadian Family Physician, 55(12), 1216–1222.

Cantone, R. E., Fleishman, J., Garvey, B., & Gideonse, N. (2018). Interdisciplinary management of opioid use disorder in primary care. Annals of Family Medicine, 16(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2184

Case, A., & Deaton, A. (2017, March 23–24). Mortality and morbidity in the 21st century [Paper presentation]. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity Conference, Washington, DC, United States. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/6_casedeaton.pdf

Corace, K., Weinrib, A., Abbott, P., Craig, K., Eaton, E., Fulton, H., McKee, S., McWilliams, L., Mushquash, C., Rush, B., Stewart, S., Taylor, S., Wendt, D., & Wilson, K. (2019). Recommendations for addressing the opioid crisis in Canada [Position paper of the Canadian Psychological Association]. https://cpa.ca/docs/File/Task_Forces/OpioidTaskforceReport_June2019.pdf

Danaher, A. (2011). Reducing health inequities: Enablers and barriers to inter-sectoral collaboration. Wellesley Institute. http://www.wellesleyinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Reducing-Health-Inequities-Enablers-and-Barriers-to-Intersectoral-Collaboration.pdf

Dasgupta, N., Beletsky, L., & Ciccarone, D. (2018). Opioid crisis: No easy fix to its social and economic determinants. American Journal of Public Health, 108(2), 182–186. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.304187

Degenhardt, L., Bucello, C., Mathers, B., Brieglieb, C., Alli, H., Hickman, M., & McLaren, J. (2011). Mortality among regular or dependent users of heroin or other opioids: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Addiction, 106, 32–51.

Farmer, P. E., Nizeye, B., Stulac, D., & Keshavjee, S. (2006). Structural violence and clinical medicine. PLoS Medicine, 3(10), e499. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030449

First Nations Health Authority. (2017). Overdose data and First Nations in BC: Preliminary findings.

First Nations Information Governance Centre. (2012). First Nations regional health survey 2008/10: National report on adults, youth and children living in First Nations communities.

Garami, J., Valikhani, A., Parkes, D., Haber, P., Mahlberg, J., Misiak, B., Frydecka, D., & Moustafa, A. A. (2019). Examining perceived stress, childhood trauma and interpersonal trauma in individuals with drug addiction. Psychological Reports, 122(2), 433–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294118764918

Kennedy-Hendricks, A., Barry, C. L., Gollust, S. E., Ensminger, M. E., Chisolm, M. S., & McGinty, E. E. (2017). Social stigma towards persons with prescription opioid use disorder: Associations with public support for punitive and public health-oriented policies. Psychiatric Services, 68(5), 462–469. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201600056

Khenti, A. (2014). The Canadian war on drugs: Structural violence and unequal treatment of Black Canadians. International Journal of Drug Policy, 25(2), 190–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.12.001

Konkolÿ Thege, B., Horwood, L., Slater, L., Tan, M. C., Hodgins, D. C., & Wild, T. C. (2017). Relationship between interpersonal trauma exposure and addictive behaviors: A systematic review. BMC Psychiatry, 17(1), 164. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1323-1

Kulesza, M., Larimer, M. E., & Rao, D. (2013). Substance use related stigma: What we know and the way forward. Journal of Addictive Behaviors, Therapy, and Rehabilitation, 2(2), 782. https://doi.org/10.4172/2324-9005.1000106

Lance, D. M., & McCullough, K. C. (n.d.). Communication strategies for interprofessional teams. Human Kinetics. https://us.humankinetics.com/blogs/excerpt/communication-strategies-for-interprofessional-teams

Levine, S., Varcoe, C., & Browne, A. J. (2020). “We went as a team closer to the truth”: Impacts of interprofessional education on trauma- and violence-informed care for staff in primary care settings. Journal of Interprofessional Care. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2019.1708871

Lewis, M. (2018). Trauma and treatment. In M. Lewis (Ed.), Paleopathology of children (pp. 91–129). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-410402-0.00005-9

Macintyre, P. E., Roberts, L. J., & Huxtable, C. A. (2020). Management of opioid-tolerant patients with acute pain: Approaching the challenges. Drugs, 80(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-019-01236-4

Marshal, M. P., Friedman, M. S., Stall, R., King, K. M., Miles, J., Gold, M. A., Bukstein, O. G., & Morse, J. Q. (2008). Sexual orientation and adolescent substance use: a meta-analysis and methodological review. Addiction, 103(4), 546–556. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02149.x

Marshall, S., Harrison, J., & Flanagan, B. (2009). The teaching of a structured tool improves the clarity and content of interprofessional clinical communication. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 18(2), 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2007.025247

Mikhail, J. N., Nemeth, L., Mueller, M., Pope, C., & NeSmith, E. (2018). The social determinants of trauma: A trauma disparities scoping review and framework. Journal of Trauma Nursing, 25(5), 226–281.

McGinty, E. E., Goldman, H. H., Pescosolido, B., & Barry, C. L. (2015). Portraying mental illness and drug addiction as treatable health conditions: Effects of a randomized experiment on stigma and discrimination. Social Science and Medicine, 127, 73 – 85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.12.010

Monteiro, K., Dumenco, L., Collins, S., Bratberg, J., MacDonnell, C., Jacobson, A., Dollase, R., & George, P. (2016). An interprofessional education workshop to develop health professional student opioid misuse knowledge, attitudes, and skills. Journal of American Pharmacists Association, 57(2S), S113–S117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2016.12.069

National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2016). Effective treatments for opioid addiction [Policy brief]. National Institutes of Health; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/effective-treatments-opioid-addiction

O’Daniel, M., & Rosenstein, A. H. (2008). Professional communication and team collaboration. In R. G. Hughes (Ed.), Patient safety and quality: An evidence-based handbook for nurses (pp. 271–284). U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Olsen, Y., & Sharfstein, J. (2014). Confronting the stigma of opioid use disorder—And its treatment. JAMA, 311(14), 1393–1394. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.2147

Quinn, K., Boone, L., Scheidell, J. D., Mateau-Gelabert, P., McGorray, S. S., Beharie, N., Cottler, L. B., & Kahn, M. R. (2016). The relationships of childhood trauma and adult prescription pain reliever misuse and injection drug use. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 1(169), 190–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.09.021

Rasulnia, M., Burton, B. S., & Patel, D. (2019). Knowledge gaps and practice patterns of clinicians treating patients with opioid use disorder. Journal of Opioid Management, 15(6), 455–468. https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.2019.0536

Special Advisory Committee on the Epidemic of Opioid Overdoses. (2019). Opioid-related harms in Canada (Health Infobase). Public Health Agency of Canada.

Statistics Canada. (2015). Table 3: Distribution of First Nations people, First Nations people with and without registered Indian status, and First Nations people with registered Indian status living on or off reserve, Canada, provinces and territories, 2011. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/as-sa/99-011-x/2011001/tbl/tbl03-eng.cfm

Stein, B. D., Pacula, R. L., Gordon, A. J., Burns, R. M., Leslie, D. L., Sorbero, M. J., Bauhoff, S., Mandell, T. W., & Dick, A. W. (2015). Where is buprenorphine dispensed to treat opioid use disorders? The role of private offices, opioid treatment programs, and substance abuse treatment facilities in urban and rural counties. The Milbank Quarterly, 93(3), 561–583. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12137

Stein, E. M., Gennuso, K. P., Ugboaja, D. C., & Remington P. L. (2017). The epidemic of despair among White Americans: Trends in the leading causes of premature death, 1999–2015. American Journal of Public Health, 107(10), 1541–1547. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.303941

Sullivan, L., & National Native Addictions Partnership Foundation. (2012). Synopsis of First Nations substance abuse issues. https://rnao.ca/sites/rnao-ca/files/RNAO-Synopsis-of-First-Nations-Substance-Abuse-Issues-2013-26-09.pdf

U.S. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration & U.S. Office of the Surgeon General. (2016). Health care systems and substance use disorders. In Facing addiction in America: The surgeon general's report on alcohol, drugs, and health (pp. 244–314). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Watkins, K. E., Ober, A. J., Lamp, K., Lind, M., Setodji, C., Osilla, K. C., Hunter, S. B., McCullough, C. M., Becker, K., Iyiewuare, P. O., Diamant, A., Heinzerling, K., & Pincus, H. A. (2017). Collaborative care for opioid and alcohol use disorders in primary care: The SUMMIT randomized clinical trial, JAMA Internal Medicine, 177(10), 1480–1488. https://10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.3947

World Health Organization. (1997). Report of a conference on intersectoral action for health: A cornerstone for health-for-all in the twenty-first century. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/63657/WHO_PPE_PAC_97.6.pdf

Yehuda, R., & Lehrner, A. (2018). Intergenerational transmission of trauma effects: putative role of epigenetic mechanisms. World Psychiatry, 17(3), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20568